Publications

Impact of detector selections on inter-institutional variability of flattening filter-free beam data for TrueBeam™ linear accelerators

Y. Tanaka, et al., Department of Radiation Therapy, Japanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto, JP

JACMP 21(1): 36-42, January 2020

The MD Anderson experience with 3D dosimetry and an MR-linac

G. Ibbott, et al., Department of Radiation Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, U.S.

Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1305 (2019)

Extended SSD VMAT treatment for total body irradiation

G. Pierce, et al., Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, CA

J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2019; 20:1:200-211

Measurement validation of treatment planning for a MR-Linac

X. Chen, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.

J Appl Clin Med Phys., 20(7): 28-38, July 2019

Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218

M. Miften, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, U.S.

Med. Phys. 45 (4), April 2018

Commissioning and acceptance guide for the GammaPod

S. Becker, et al.

Phys Med Biol., 64 (20), Oct 2019

SU‐E‐T‐54: A New Method for Optimizing Radiation Isocenter for Linac‐Based SRS

S. Hancock, et al.

Med. Phys., 42 (3343-3343) (June 2015)

Analysis of dose variations and sources of error in VMAT treatments with an EPID-based in vivo dosimetry system

L. Botez, et al.

Physica Medica Volume 56, Supplement 2, December 2018, Page 64

Integrated Platform Supports Advances in Radiation Therapy Workflow

Physics World, June 2018

Acceptance and verification of a Halcyon-Eclipse linear accelerator-treatment planning system without 3D water scanning

S. Gao, et al. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,

J Appl Clin Med Phys, Aug 2019;1-7

The Effect of Acoustic Velocity on Phantom Measurements

A. Goldstein, Department of Radiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, U.S.

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 26, pp. 1133-1143, 2003

Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems - version 1.03

EUREF

Stereotactic QA: saving time, delivering outcomes

Physics World, July 2019

Comprehensive evaluation of the high resolution diode array for SRS dosimetry

S. Ahmed, V. Feygelman, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, US

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2019; 1-11

Comprehensive commissioning of MR-Linac online adaptive radiotherapy QA

O. Green, et al.

ESTRO 2019

First MR-Guided Online Adaptive Patient Treatment in North America On An In-Room High Field (1.5 T) MRI Linac

S. Vedam, et al., MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, U.S.

AAPM 2019

Clinical Experience of Patient-Specific QA for Online Adaptive Radiotherapy Using Elekta Unity MR-Linac

J. Yang, et al.

AAPM 2019

1-year experience with automated transit in vivo dosimetry in a busy multicenter department

E. Bossuyt, et al.,

ESTRO 2019

First Report of the Clinical use of a Commercial Automated System for Daily Patient QA using EPID Exit Images

A. Olch, et al., Radiation Oncology Department, University of Southern California, California Radiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CS, U.S.

Advances in Radiation Oncology (2019) 1-7

Validation of three-dimensional electronic portal imaging device-based PerFRACTION™ software for patient-specific quality assurance

Sait A, et al., Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Centre Eastern Caribbean, St. John's, Antigua

J Med Phys 2019;44:16-20